Championship QB insights
Homepage › Forums › Start Bench › Championship QB insights
- This topic has 9 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks, 2 days ago by Z-Dubbs.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
December 26, 2024 at 6:08 am #7909Z-DubbsParticipant
- 224
I have Nix and Darnold. Although I have similar pt expectations, I think Nix will have a better stat line.
I am lucky enough to have started the Ravens D and Kelce vs. him having Pickens and Fairbairn so I have some cushion.
He has JJ. Do I hedge against a HUGE game by JJ and start Darnold? I normally don’t hedge, but a decent amount of money is on the line.
I would love any seasoned vet perspective. I just want to play smart vs. gut.
-
December 26, 2024 at 12:42 pm #7911icemanParticipant
- 79
Agree Nix.
-
December 26, 2024 at 1:47 pm #7912Christopher WernerParticipant
- 15
I would lean Nix.
-
December 26, 2024 at 11:15 pm #7913SmittyKeymaster
- 472
Hmm, could go either way. Darnold is harder to sit tho if that makes sense. Doesn’t mean they dont have similar upside.
-
December 27, 2024 at 8:23 am #7919Charles FoxParticipant
- 598
On Smitty said<p>Hmm, could go either way. Darnold is harder to sit tho if that makes sense. Doesn’t mean they dont have similar upside. </p>
Yep… Nix has been a breathe of fresh air and has a better matchup. But Darnold has been rebuilt and has 2 awesome weapons
-
December 27, 2024 at 9:42 am #7925Z-DubbsParticipant
- 224
On Charles Fox saidOn Smitty said<p><p>Hmm, could go either way. Darnold is harder to sit tho if that makes sense. Doesn’t mean they dont have similar upside. </p>
</p><p></p>
<p>Yep… Nix has been a breathe of fresh air and has a better matchup. But Darnold has been rebuilt and has 2 awesome weapons</p><be> yeah – I am just looking at what is more of an analytic type play – smart vs. gut. I like Nix but I think the smart play is Darnold since I have very little to worry about regarding JJ doing a jet sweep for a TD. (there – I said it – and watch JJ is going to take a jet sweep 70 yards…)
-
December 27, 2024 at 3:25 pm #7927Charles FoxParticipant
- 598
On Z-Dubbs saidOn Charles Fox saidOn Smitty said<p><p><p>Hmm, could go either way. Darnold is harder to sit tho if that makes sense. Doesn’t mean they dont have similar upside. </p>
</p></p><p><p></p>
<p>Yep… Nix has been a breathe of fresh air and has a better matchup. But Darnold has been rebuilt and has 2 awesome weapons</p>
</p><p><be> yeah – I am just looking at what is more of an analytic type play – smart vs. gut. I like Nix but I think the smart play is Darnold since I have very little to worry about regarding JJ doing a jet sweep for a TD. (there – I said it – and watch JJ is going to take a jet sweep 70 yards…)</p>
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
-
December 28, 2024 at 6:55 am #7964HessParticipant
- 206
I lean Darnold. He has better weapons and it’s not really a playoff game environment like Cincy vs Denver.
-
December 29, 2024 at 7:10 am #7976Charles FoxParticipant
- 598
On Hess said<p>I lean Darnold. He has better weapons and it’s not really a playoff game environment like Cincy vs Denver. </p>
I had Nix going for me in my consolation tournament where the bottom 4 teams play a round-robin for the 2025 1.01 / 2.10
Nix MIGHT have done enough for me to win it. Darnold will have to go along way to surpass Nix, but I also have JJ in my game so I am hoping
-
December 29, 2024 at 7:42 am #7977Z-DubbsParticipant
- 224
On Charles Fox saidOn Hess said<p><p>I lean Darnold. He has better weapons and it’s not really a playoff game environment like Cincy vs Denver. </p>
</p><p></p>
<p>I had Nix going for me in my consolation tournament where the bottom 4 teams play a round-robin for the 2025 1.01 / 2.10</p>
<p>Nix MIGHT have done enough for me to win it. Darnold will have to go along way to surpass Nix, but I also have JJ in my game so I am hoping</p>I went with Darnold. My bench points count though for total points. As long as he finishes out the game – I should be ok but man…gut told me to use Nix. Glad to have him as mg keeper for next year.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.