Kincaid risky?
Risk for Kincaid
- Not high
- High but worth it
- High - there are better options
- This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 4 months ago by
Smitty.
-
Posts
-
-
David Lazoff
- 24
Huge upside but we haven’t seen him “do it” yet – while McBride, Andrews, Kittle have. If McBride is off the board, go with Andrews if available, or wait for Kittle? Last year Waller was projected to be the #1 receiver and he was a huge bust, even before his injury.
Thanks guys
Dakota Dave -
Daniel Krawiec
- 11
I live in Buffalo, NY and have been to some of the practices, pre-season, etc. He is legit. The media here knows it too. My opinion is Mcbride has a better season since AZ has less weapons than Buff. Buffalo (although no Diggs or Gabe) still has Curtis Samuel, Kincaid, Knox, Keon, Shakir, MVS and even Mack Hollins. All good players in real life.
-
- 24
Thanks Daniel, appreciate it! I think the major argument against Kincaid is his splits last year with Knox injured/playing. If I remember right Knox got a lot more endzone targets.
-
Doobie Snacks
- 30
All about the Kincaid train! Choo! Chooo!
-
Swampies
- 58
He will be the number one receiving target besides Coleman will be the number two
-
Smitty
- 447
Buffalo had the second most vacated targets in the NFL and Coleman will eat up a ton of those, but a lot of the leftovers will be spread out .. and adding to Kincaid’s already accounted for workload… That makes Kincaid a monster. Buffalo won’t miss a beat and Josh Allen was at his best from midseason on, when Diggs was out of the picture… It’s gonna be a huge year in Buffalo and both Coleman and Kincaid are going to eat tons.
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.