Kincaid risky?

Homepage Forums Redraft Kincaid risky?

Risk for Kincaid

You must be logged in to participate.
  • Not high
  • High but worth it
  • High - there are better options
Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #6084
      David Lazoff
      Participant
      • 24

      Huge upside but we haven’t seen him “do it” yet – while McBride, Andrews, Kittle have. If McBride is off the board, go with Andrews if available, or wait for Kittle? Last year Waller was projected to be the #1 receiver and he was a huge bust, even before his injury.

      Thanks guys
      Dakota Dave

    • #6088
      Daniel Krawiec
      Participant
      • 11

      I live in Buffalo, NY and have been to some of the practices, pre-season, etc. He is legit. The media here knows it too. My opinion is Mcbride has a better season since AZ has less weapons than Buff. Buffalo (although no Diggs or Gabe) still has Curtis Samuel, Kincaid, Knox, Keon, Shakir, MVS and even Mack Hollins. All good players in real life.

    • #6092
      David Lazoff
      Participant
      • 24

      Thanks Daniel, appreciate it! I think the major argument against Kincaid is his splits last year with Knox injured/playing. If I remember right Knox got a lot more endzone targets.

    • #6118
      Doobie Snacks
      Moderator
      • 30

      All about the Kincaid train! Choo! Chooo!

    • #6129
      Swampies
      Moderator
      • 58

      He will be the number one receiving target besides Coleman will be the number two

    • #6159
      Smitty
      Keymaster
      • 430

      Buffalo had the second most vacated targets in the NFL and Coleman will eat up a ton of those, but a lot of the leftovers will be spread out .. and adding to Kincaid’s already accounted for workload… That makes Kincaid a monster. Buffalo won’t miss a beat and Josh Allen was at his best from midseason on, when Diggs was out of the picture… It’s gonna be a huge year in Buffalo and both Coleman and Kincaid are going to eat tons.

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.